Rossi-Reaktor

23/05/2013 - 19:59 von Harald Maedl | Report spam
Oops, am Rossi-Reaktor scheint sich tatsàchlich etwas zu tun, was man
derzeit nicht wirklich erklàren kann.

Paper:
Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device
Autoren:
Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbjörn Hartman, Bo Höistad, Roland
Pettersson, Lars Tegnér, Hanno Essén

"The reactor tube is charged with a small amount of hydrogen loaded
nickel powder plus some additives. The reaction is primarily initiated
by heat from resistor coils inside the reactor tube. Measurement of the
produced heat was performed with high-resolution thermal imaging
cameras, recording data every second from the hot reactor tube. The
measurements of electrical power input were performed with a large
bandwidth three-phase power analyzer. Data were collected in two
experimental runs lasting 96 and 116 hours, respectively. An anomalous
heat production was indicated in both experiments Even by the most
conservative assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the
result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional energy
sources."

<http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913>
 

Lesen sie die antworten

#1 .... ....
25/05/2013 - 07:36 | Warnen spam
Harald Maedl wrote in
news::

Oops, am Rossi-Reaktor scheint sich tatsàchlich etwas zu tun, was man
derzeit nicht wirklich erklàren kann.



Tatsàchlich? Wau!

Paper: Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor
device Autoren: Giuseppe Levi, Evelyn Foschi, Torbjörn Hartman, Bo
Höistad, Roland Pettersson, Lars Tegnér, Hanno Essén



Achso blos mal wieder so ein geschönter Hinweis um weitere
Forschungsgelder genehmigt zu bekommen. Nach der Genehmigumg wird es sich
wohl mal wieder blos als Messfehler herausstellen.

"The reactor tube is charged with a small amount of hydrogen loaded
nickel powder plus some additives. The reaction is primarily initiated
by heat from resistor coils inside the reactor tube. Measurement of
the produced heat was performed with high-resolution thermal imaging
cameras, recording data every second from the hot reactor tube. The
measurements of electrical power input were performed with a large
bandwidth three-phase power analyzer. Data were collected in two
experimental runs lasting 96 and 116 hours, respectively. An anomalous
heat production was indicated in both experiments Even by the most
conservative assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the
result is still one order of magnitude greater than conventional
energy sources."

<http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913>



Wau, wau, da tut sich was. Leider muss man noch die Messfehler
geringrechnen und das Ergebnis schönrechnen und auch noch
viel hineininterpretieren damit etwas raus kommt.



"An anomalous heat production ..."



Wahrscheinlich die heisse Luft der Protagonisten.



"Even by the most conservative assumptions as to the errors in the
measurements ..."



Anscheinend ist der Effekt dann doch noch so klein, dass er noch im
Bereich der Messfehler liegt. Damit soll man was einmal tun können?



Wenn wirklich ein richtiger Effekt da wàre sollte man diesen ohne
jedwelche statistische Unsicherheit und Schönrevhnerei eindeutig sehen
können.



Kaffeetratschgeplànkel!

Ähnliche fragen